Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864706›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Evolution of Hybrid Intelligence and Its Application in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Review.

Valentina Bellini, Marco Badino, Massimo Maffezzoni, Francesca Bezzi, Elena Bignami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina BelliniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery - Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, University of Parma: Universita degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Marco BadinoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery - Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, University of Parma: Universita degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Massimo MaffezzoniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery - Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, University of Parma: Universita degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesca BezziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery - Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, University of Parma: Universita degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Elena BignamiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery - Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, University of Parma: Universita degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern medicine, both in clinical practice and research, has become more and more based on data, which is changing equally in type and quality with the advent and development of healthcare digitalization. The first part of the present paper aims to present the steps through which data, and subsequently clinical and research practice, have evolved from paper-based to digital, proposing a possible future of this digitalization in terms of potential applications and integration of digital tools in medical practice. Noting that digitalization is no more a possible future, but a concrete reality, there is a strong need for a new definition of evidence-based medicine, which must take into account the progressive integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in all decision-making processes. So, leaving behind the traditional research concept of human intelligence versus AI, poorly adaptable to real-world clinical practice, a Human and AI hybrid model, seen as a deep integration of AI and human thinking, is proposed as a new healthcare governance system. The second part of our review is focused on some of the major challenges the digitalization process has to face, particularly privacy issues, system complexity and opacity, and ethical concerns related to legal aspects and healthcare disparities. Analyzing these open issues, we aim to present some of the future directions that in our opinion should be pursued to implement AI in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIntelligenceEvidence-Based MedicineHealth FacilitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID36864706
PMCPMC9990324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.