ReviewClinical kidney journal2023
Donor liquid biopsy and outcomes in kidney transplantation.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Operational checks for real-time urinary biomarker measurements for assessment of the quality of deceased donor kidneys.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsies for early detection and monitoring of cancer: advances, challenges, and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- LRG1 Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Multiple Kidney Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with kidney failure. Priority on the waiting list and optimal donor-recipient matching are guided by mathematical scores, clinical variables and macroscopic observation of the donated organ. Despite the increasing rates of successful kidney transplantation, maximizing the number of available organs while ensuring the optimum long-term performance of the transplanted kidney remains both key and challenging, and no unequivocal markers are available for clinical decision making. Moreover, the majority of studies performed thus far has focused on the risk of primary non-function and delayed graft function and subsequent survival and have mainly analysed recipients' samples. Given the increasing use of donors with expanded criteria and/or cardiac death, predicting whether grafts will provide sufficient kidney function is increasingly more challenging. Here we compile the available tools for pre-transplant kidney evaluation and summarize the latest molecular data from donors that may predict short-term (immediate or delayed graft function), medium-term (6 months) and long-term (≥12 months) kidney function. The use of liquid biopsy (urine, serum, plasma) to overcome the limitations of the pre-transplant histological evaluation is proposed. Novel molecules and approaches such as the use of urinary extracellular vesicles are also reviewed and discussed, along with directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.