ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023
Multimodal deep learning methods enhance genomic prediction of wheat breeding.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving grain yield prediction in Southern US oat germplasm using genomics information and environmental covariates.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Structured multimodal deep learning improves genomic prediction in future environments.Genetics · 2026Article
- Machine learning to predict genotypes and genotype-environment interaction associated with complex traits for genomic selection.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Multimodality, interaction modeling, and multimodule architectures in genomic prediction: A unified conceptual framework.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Harnessing genomics approaches for heat stress resilience in wheat: from discovery to deployment.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- 2NPLGBM: a genomic model that merges the strengths of classical and machine learning methods in genomic prediction.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Bridging the Divide: Integrating Cottonseed Oil Content with Agronomic Trait Improvement in Upland Cotton (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The next frontier for genomic prediction is computational.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Normalized cumulative gain as an alternative evaluation measure for genomic selection models.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Edible Mushroom Cultivation, Breeding, and Classification: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimization and application of genome prediction model in rapeseed: flowering time, yield components, and oil content as examples.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Big data and artificial intelligence-aided crop breeding: Progress and prospects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence meets genomic selection: comparing deep learning and GBLUP across diverse plant datasets.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- A review of multimodal deep learning methods for genomic-enabled prediction in plant breeding.Genetics · 2024Article
- Deep learning methods improve genomic prediction of wheat breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Ridge regression and deep learning models for genome-wide selection of complex traits in New Mexican Chile peppers.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Leveraging data from the Genomes-to-Fields Initiative to investigate genotype-by-environment interactions in maize in North America.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While several statistical machine learning methods have been developed and studied for assessing the genomic prediction (GP) accuracy of unobserved phenotypes in plant breeding research, few methods have linked genomics and phenomics (imaging). Deep learning (DL) neural networks have been developed to increase the GP accuracy of unobserved phenotypes while simultaneously accounting for the complexity of genotype-environment interaction (GE); however, unlike conventional GP models, DL has not been investigated for when genomics is linked with phenomics. In this study we used 2 wheat data sets (DS1 and DS2) to compare a novel DL method with conventional GP models. Models fitted for DS1 were GBLUP, gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector regression (SVR) and the DL method. Results indicated that for 1 year, DL provided better GP accuracy than results obtained by the other models. However, GP accuracy obtained for other years indicated that the GBLUP model was slightly superior to the DL. DS2 is comprised only of genomic data from wheat lines tested for 3 years, 2 environments (drought and irrigated) and 2-4 traits. DS2 results showed that when predicting the irrigated environment with the drought environment, DL had higher accuracy than the GBLUP model in all analyzed traits and years. When predicting drought environment with information on the irrigated environment, the DL model and GBLUP model had similar accuracy. The DL method used in this study is novel and presents a strong degree of generalization as several modules can potentially be incorporated and concatenated to produce an output for a multi-input data structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.