Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871010›Full record

ReviewCell & bioscience2023

Nanomedicine for autophagy modulation in cancer therapy: a clinical perspective.

Tania B López-Méndez, Miguel Sánchez-Álvarez, Flavia Trionfetti, José L Pedraz, Marco Tripodi, Marco Cordani, Raffaele Strippoli, Juan González-Valdivieso

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell & bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A Nanorobotics-Based Approach of Breast Cancer in the Nanotechnology Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tania B López-Méndez *NanoBioCel Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Miguel Sánchez-Álvarez *Area of Cell and Developmental Biology. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Flavia TrionfettiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
José L PedrazNanoBioCel Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Marco TripodiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco Cordani *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain. mcordani@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-4862
Raffaele Strippoli *Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. raffaele.strippoli@uniroma1.it.
Juan González-Valdivieso *Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA. juan.gonzalez.valdivieso@uva.es.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Ramon y Cajal Fellow (Grant Number: RYC2020-029690-I)Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Ramon y Cajal Fellow (Grant Number: RYC2021-031003-I)Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 000003_17_MAP_STRIPMinistero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca FISR 2020-Covid FISR2020IP_03366Universidad Complutense de Madrid Maria Zambrano Fellow (Call of grants for the requalification of the Spanish university system 2021-2023)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, progress in nanotechnology provided new tools to treat cancer more effectively. Advances in biomaterials tailored for drug delivery have the potential to overcome the limited selectivity and side effects frequently associated with traditional therapeutic agents. While autophagy is pivotal in determining cell fate and adaptation to different challenges, and despite the fact that it is frequently dysregulated in cancer, antitumor therapeutic strategies leveraging on or targeting this process are scarce. This is due to many reasons, including the very contextual effects of autophagy in cancer, low bioavailability and non-targeted delivery of existing autophagy modulatory compounds. Conjugating the versatile characteristics of nanoparticles with autophagy modulators may render these drugs safer and more effective for cancer treatment. Here, we review current standing questions on the biology of autophagy in tumor progression, and precursory studies and the state-of-the-art in harnessing nanomaterials science to enhance the specificity and therapeutic potential of autophagy modulators.

Indexed as

AutophagyBiomaterialsCancerClinical trialsNanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID36871010
PMCPMC9985235

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.