ArticleScientific reports2023
Feasibility and intra-and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping with radiomic features for intracranial dissecting intramural hematomas and atherosclerotic calcifications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in predicting recurrence after first-line treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Serial changes and optimal imaging windows in vessel wall MRI for unruptured intracranial artery dissection.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Comparing repeatability metrics for quantitative susceptibility mapping in the head and neck.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Beyond Size: Advanced MRI Breakthroughs in Predicting Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessing robustness of quantitative susceptibility-based MRI radiomic features in patients with multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) for 61 patients with dissecting intramural hematomas (n = 36) or atherosclerotic calcifications (n = 25) in intracranial vertebral arteries were collected to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility in a 3.0-T MR system between January 2015 and December 2017. Two independent observers each segmented regions of interest for lesions twice. The reproducibility was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and within-subject coefficients of variation (wCV) for means and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) and ICC for radiomic features (CCC and ICC > 0.85) were used. Mean QSM values were 0.277 ± 0.092 ppm for dissecting intramural hematomas and - 0.208 ± 0.078 ppm for atherosclerotic calcifications. ICCs and wCVs were 0.885-0.969 and 6.5-13.7% in atherosclerotic calcifications and 0.712-0.865 and 12.4-18.7% in dissecting intramural hematomas, respectively. A total of 9 and 19 reproducible radiomic features were observed in dissecting intramural hematomas and atherosclerotic calcifications, respectively. QSM measurements in dissecting intramural hematomas and atherosclerotic calcifications were feasible and reproducible between intra- and interobserver comparisons, and some reproducible radiomic features were demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.