ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
Strain-dependent elastography of cancer cells reveals heterogeneity and stiffening due to attachment.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A method for analyzing AFM force mapping data obtained from soft tissue cryosections.Journal of biomechanics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Because cells vary in thickness and in biomechanical properties, the use of a constant force trigger during atomic force microscopy (AFM) stiffness mapping produces a varied nominal strain that can obfuscate the comparison of local material properties. In this study, we measured the biomechanical spatial heterogeneity of ovarian and breast cancer cells by using an indentation-dependent pointwise Hertzian method. Force curves and surface topography were used together to determine cell stiffness as a function of nominal strain. By recording stiffness at a particular strain, it may be possible to improve comparison of the material properties of cells and produce higher contrast representations of cell mechanical properties. Defining a linear region of elasticity that corresponds to a modest nominal strain, we were able to clearly distinguish the mechanics of the perinuclear region of cells. We observed that, relative to the lamelopodial stiffness, the perinuclear region was softer for metastatic cancer cells than their nonmetastatic counterparts. Moreover, contrast in the strain-dependent elastography in comparison to conventional force mapping with Hertzian model analysis revealed a significant stiffening phenomenon in the thin lamellipodial region in which the modulus scales inversely and exponentially with cell thickness. The observed exponential stiffening is not affected by relaxation of cytoskeletal tension, but finite element modeling indicates it is affected by substrate adhesion. The novel cell mapping technique explores cancer cell mechanical nonlinearity that results from regional heterogeneity, which could help explain how metastatic cancer cells can show soft phenotypes while simultaneously increasing force generation and invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.