Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873213›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Association between anxiety and metabolic syndrome: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shuang Ji, Yujiao Chen, Yuying Zhou, Yiting Cao, Xiao Li, Guoyong Ding, Fang Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuang JiDepartment of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Weifang Medical University and Shandong Institute of Neuroimmunology, Jinan, China.
Yujiao ChenDepartment of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Weifang Medical University and Shandong Institute of Neuroimmunology, Jinan, China.
Yuying ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Weifang Medical University and Shandong Institute of Neuroimmunology, Jinan, China.
Yiting CaoDepartment of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Weifang Medical University and Shandong Institute of Neuroimmunology, Jinan, China.
Xiao LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Guoyong DingSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Fang TangDepartment of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Weifang Medical University and Shandong Institute of Neuroimmunology, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between anxiety and metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, the association is still controversial. This updated meta-analysis aimed to reanalyze the association between anxiety and MetS. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for all related studies published before January 23, 2023. Observational studies that informed effect size with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between anxiety and MetS were included. According to heterogeneity between studies, fixed or random effects models were applied to calculate the pooled effect size. Publication bias was examined by funnel plots. Results: The research included 24 cross-sectional studies: 20 studies used MetS as the dependent variable with a pooled OR of 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01-1.13) and four studies used anxiety as the dependent variable with a pooled OR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23). Three cohort studies were found: two studies detected the association of baseline anxiety with the risk of MetS, one of the studies demonstrated a significant association, but a similar result was not found in another study; one study showed no significant association between baseline MetS and the risk of anxiety. Conclusion: Cross-sectional studies indicated an association between anxiety and MetS. The results from cohort studies are still inconsistent and limited. More large-scale prospective studies are needed to further reveal the causal relationship of anxiety with MetS.

Indexed as

anxietycohort studycross-sectional studymeta-analysismetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36873213
PMCPMC9978147

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.