Four numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
the abstract, start to end
… [11.7%] vs. 927 [13.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 0.96; P = 0.004), as were the incidences of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction (575 [8.2%] vs. 663 [9.5%]; hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P = 0.006); fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (261 [3.7%] vs. 334 [4.8%]; hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.91; P = 0.002); and coronary revascularization (435 [6.2%] vs. 529 [7.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92; …
← favours treatmentfavours comparator →
could be chanceCardiovascular events
HR 0.870.79–0.96
Cardiovascular events
HR 0.850.76–0.96
Cardiovascular events
HR 0.770.66–0.91
Cardiovascular events
HR 0.810.72–0.92
Other lipid agentsCardiovascular events
1 / 3