Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877733›Full record

Trial reportPLoS computational biology2023

Macroscopic resting state model predicts theta burst stimulation response: A randomized trial.

Neda Kaboodvand, Behzad Iravani, Martijn P van den Heuvel, Jonas Persson, Robert Boden

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Neda KaboodvandDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0264-6839
Behzad IravaniDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-1067
Martijn P van den HeuvelDepartment of Complex Traits Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonas PerssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robert BodenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising alternative therapy for treatment-resistant depression, although its limited remission rate indicates room for improvement. As depression is a phenomenological construction, the biological heterogeneity within this syndrome needs to be considered to improve the existing therapies. Whole-brain modeling provides an integrative multi-modal framework for capturing disease heterogeneity in a holistic manner. Computational modelling combined with probabilistic nonparametric fitting was applied to the resting-state fMRI data from 42 patients (21 women), to parametrize baseline brain dynamics in depression. All patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, namely active (i.e., rTMS, n = 22) or sham (n = 20). The active treatment group received rTMS treatment with an accelerated intermittent theta burst protocol over the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. The sham treatment group underwent the identical procedure but with the magnetically shielded side of the coil. We stratified the depression sample into distinct covert subtypes based on their baseline attractor dynamics captured by different model parameters. Notably, the two detected depression subtypes exhibited different phenotypic behaviors at baseline. Our stratification could predict the diverse response to the active treatment that could not be explained by the sham treatment. Critically, we further found that one group exhibited more distinct improvement in certain affective and negative symptoms. The subgroup of patients with higher responsiveness to treatment exhibited blunted frequency dynamics for intrinsic activity at baseline, as indexed by lower global metastability and synchrony. Our findings suggested that whole-brain modeling of intrinsic dynamics may constitute a determinant for stratifying patients into treatment groups and bringing us closer towards precision medicine.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBrainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansPrefrontal CortexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36877733
PMCPMC10019702
OpenAlexW4323295282

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read53
table measurements read1
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.