ArticleHeredity2023
First large-scale genomic prediction in the honey bee.
Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing standards for genome wide association studies in eusocial insects through a case study in honey bees.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction in insects: a case study on wing morphology traits in the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of Blending, Tuning, and Scaling Parameters in ssGBLUP for Genomic Prediction Accuracy in South African Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- How partial phenotyping to reduce generation intervals can help to increase annual genetic gain in selected honeybee populations.Heredity · 2025Article
- Article
- Sequence-Based Multi Ancestry Association Study Reveals the Polygenic Architecture of Varroa destructor Resistance in the Honeybee Apis mellifera.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Individual and social heterosis act independently in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.The Journal of heredity · 2025Article
- Genomic diversity and population structure of Carniolan honey bee in its native habitat.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.Hereditas · 2024Article
- Do Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) mite flows between Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies bias colony infestation evaluation for resistance selection?Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- Population-wide modelling reveals prospects of marker-assisted selection for parasitic mite resistance in honey bees.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of pooled semen insemination and single colony insemination as sustainable honeybee breeding strategies.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection has increased genetic gain in several livestock species, but due to the complicated genetics and reproduction biology not yet in honey bees. Recently, 2970 queens were genotyped to gather a reference population. For the application of genomic selection in honey bees, this study analyzes the accuracy and bias of pedigree-based and genomic breeding values for honey yield, three workability traits, and two traits for resistance against the parasite Varroa destructor. For breeding value estimation, we use a honey bee-specific model with maternal and direct effects, to account for the contributions of the workers and the queen of a colony to the phenotypes. We conducted a validation for the last generation and a five-fold cross-validation. In the validation for the last generation, the accuracy of pedigree-based estimated breeding values was 0.12 for honey yield, and ranged from 0.42 to 0.61 for the workability traits. The inclusion of genomic marker data improved these accuracies to 0.23 for honey yield, and a range from 0.44 to 0.65 for the workability traits. The inclusion of genomic data did not improve the accuracy of the disease-related traits. Traits with high heritability for maternal effects compared to the heritability for direct effects showed the most promising results. For all traits except the Varroa resistance traits, the bias with genomic methods was on a similar level compared to the bias with pedigree-based BLUP. The results show that genomic selection can successfully be applied to honey bees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.