Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36878945›Full record

ArticleHeredity2023

First large-scale genomic prediction in the honey bee.

Richard Bernstein, Manuel Du, Zhipei G Du, Anja S Strauss, Andreas Hoppe, Kaspar Bienefeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard BernsteinInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany. richard.bernstein@hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7777-4272
Manuel DuInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2264-1610
Zhipei G DuInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.
Anja S StraussInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.
Andreas HoppeInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.
Kaspar BienefeldInstitute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection has increased genetic gain in several livestock species, but due to the complicated genetics and reproduction biology not yet in honey bees. Recently, 2970 queens were genotyped to gather a reference population. For the application of genomic selection in honey bees, this study analyzes the accuracy and bias of pedigree-based and genomic breeding values for honey yield, three workability traits, and two traits for resistance against the parasite Varroa destructor. For breeding value estimation, we use a honey bee-specific model with maternal and direct effects, to account for the contributions of the workers and the queen of a colony to the phenotypes. We conducted a validation for the last generation and a five-fold cross-validation. In the validation for the last generation, the accuracy of pedigree-based estimated breeding values was 0.12 for honey yield, and ranged from 0.42 to 0.61 for the workability traits. The inclusion of genomic marker data improved these accuracies to 0.23 for honey yield, and a range from 0.44 to 0.65 for the workability traits. The inclusion of genomic data did not improve the accuracy of the disease-related traits. Traits with high heritability for maternal effects compared to the heritability for direct effects showed the most promising results. For all traits except the Varroa resistance traits, the bias with genomic methods was on a similar level compared to the bias with pedigree-based BLUP. The results show that genomic selection can successfully be applied to honey bees.

Indexed as

GenomeVarroidaeAnimalsBeesGenomicsGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36878945
PMCPMC10163272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.