Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36879741›Full record

ArticleTanaffos2022

Asthma Management System in Primary Care Based on Global Initiative for Asthma and Snell's Drug Interaction: Accuracy and Usability.

Saman Mohammadpour, Farahnaz Sadoughi, Saba Arshi, Shirin Ayani, Morteza Fallahpour, Rafat Bagherzadeh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tanaffos, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 67% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saman MohammadpourDepartment of Health Information Management and Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farahnaz SadoughiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saba ArshiDepartment of Immunology and Allergy, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shirin AyaniResearch Center, FANAP Co., Tehran, Iran.
Morteza FallahpourDepartment of Immunology and Allergy, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rafat BagherzadehDepartment of English Language, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRRasool Akram Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The two main pillars of asthma management include regular follow-up and using guidelines in the treatment process. Patient portals enable regular follow-up of disease, and guideline-based decision-support-systems can improve the use of guidelines in the treatment process. Based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Snell's drug interaction, asthma management system in primary care (AMSPC) includes the capabilities of both mentioned systems. This system was developed to improve regular follow-up and use GINA in the asthma management process. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and usability of the AMSPC based on the GINA and Snell's drug interaction. Materials and Methods: To assess the accuracy of the system, kappa test was used to calculate the degree of agreement between the suggestions made by the system and the physician's decision for a total of 64 patients selected through convenience sampling method. To assess usability, the Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS) was used. Results: The scores of the Kappa for the agreements between the system and the physician in determining "drug type and dosage", "follow-up time", and "drug interactions" were 0.90, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively. The average score of the QUIS was 8.6 out of 9. Conclusion: Due to the high accuracy of the system in computerizing the GINA and Snell's drug interaction, as well as its proper usability, it is expected that the system be widely used to improve asthma management and reduce drug interactions.

Indexed as

AccuracyAsthma management systemDrug interactionGlobal Initiative for AsthmaPrimary careUsability

Identifiers

PMID36879741
PMCPMC9985120
OpenAlexW4323347945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.