Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882583›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Dermoscopy of genodermatoses].

Dóra Plázár, Marie Isolde Joura, Norbert Kiss, Márta Medvecz

Full text readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dóra PlázárKlinik für Dermatologie, Venereologie und Dermatoonkologie, Semmelweis Universität Budapest, Mária Straße 41, 1085, Budapest, Ungarn.
Marie Isolde JouraKlinik für Dermatologie, Venereologie und Dermatoonkologie, Semmelweis Universität Budapest, Mária Straße 41, 1085, Budapest, Ungarn.
Norbert KissKlinik für Dermatologie, Venereologie und Dermatoonkologie, Semmelweis Universität Budapest, Mária Straße 41, 1085, Budapest, Ungarn.
Márta MedveczKlinik für Dermatologie, Venereologie und Dermatoonkologie, Semmelweis Universität Budapest, Mária Straße 41, 1085, Budapest, Ungarn. medvecz.marta@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genodermatoses are a group of inherited skin diseases whose diagnosis is challenging due to their rarity as well as their clinical and genetic diversity. The majority of genodermatoses are autosomal or X‑linked inherited, but mosaic forms are also observed. Genodermatoses comprise various phenotypes ranging from limited cutaneous disease to severe cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and may also be early warning signs of a multisystemic disorder. Despite recent advances in genetic technology and skin imaging modalities, dermoscopy can be useful for screening, diagnosis, and treatment follow-up. In ectopic mineralization and lysosomal storage disorders (pseudoxanthoma elasticum and Fabry disease, respectively), cutaneous manifestations may indicate involvement of other organs. In keratinization diseases (e.g., ichthyoses) and acantholytic skin fragility disorders (e.g., Darier and Hailey-Hailey disease), dermoscopy may help to assess treatment response by visualizing background erythema, hyperkeratosis, and interkeratinocyte space prominence. Dermoscopy is a noninvasive, easily accessible, useful, in vivo assessment tool that is well established in dermatology to recognize characteristic features of genodermatoses.

Indexed as

IchthyosisKeratosisPemphigus, Benign FamilialDermoscopyHumansSkinAcantholytic dermatosisAngiokeratomaDyskeratosisIchthyosisPseudoxanthoma elasticum

Identifiers

PMID36882583
PMCPMC10050017

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.