ReviewStem cells and development2023
Opening the "Black Box" Underlying Barriers to the Use of Canine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Narrative Review.
Review in Stem cells and development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing stem cell technologies for conservation of wildlife biodiversity.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are produced by resetting the epigenetic and transcriptional landscapes of somatic cells to express the endogenous pluripotency network and revert them back to an undifferentiated state. The reduced ethical concerns associated with iPSCs and their capacity for extensive self-renewal and differentiation make them an unparalleled resource for drug discovery, disease modeling, and novel therapies. Canines (c) share many human diseases and environmental exposures, making them a superior translational model for drug screening and investigating human pathologies compared to other mammals. However, well-defined protocols for legitimate ciPSC production are lacking. Problems during canine somatic cell reprogramming (SCR) yield putative ciPSCs with incomplete pluripotency, at very low efficiencies. Despite the value of ciPSCs, the molecular mechanisms underlying their unsuccessful production and how these may be addressed have not been fully elucidated. Factors, including cost, safety, and feasibility, may also limit the widespread clinical adoption of ciPSCs for treating canine disease. The purpose of this narrative review is to identify barriers to canine SCR on molecular and cellular levels, using comparative research to inform potential solutions to their use in both research and clinical contexts. Current research is opening new doors for the application of ciPSCs in regenerative medicine for the mutual benefit of veterinary and human medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.