Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894697›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Deep Learning Body Region Classification of MRI and CT Examinations.

Philippe Raffy, Jean-François Pambrun, Ashish Kumar, David Dubois, Jay Waldron Patti, Robyn Alexandra Cairns, Ryan Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Automatic Body Region Classification in CT Scans Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philippe RaffyClairity, Austin, TX, USA.
Jean-François PambrunEnterprise Imaging Solutions, Change Healthcare, 10711 Cambie Road, Richmond, BC, V6X 3G5, Canada.
Ashish KumarEnterprise Imaging Solutions, Change Healthcare, 10711 Cambie Road, Richmond, BC, V6X 3G5, Canada.
David DuboisEnterprise Imaging Solutions, Change Healthcare, 10711 Cambie Road, Richmond, BC, V6X 3G5, Canada. David.Dubois1@changehealthcare.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6629-9605
Jay Waldron PattiMecklenburg Radiology Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Robyn Alexandra CairnsUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ryan YoungEnterprise Imaging Solutions, Change Healthcare, 10711 Cambie Road, Richmond, BC, V6X 3G5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study demonstrates the high performance of deep learning in identification of body regions covering the entire human body from magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) axial images across diverse acquisition protocols and modality manufacturers. Pixel-based analysis of anatomy contained in image sets can provide accurate anatomic labeling. For this purpose, a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classifier was developed to identify body regions in CT and MRI studies. Seventeen CT (18 MRI) body regions covering the entire human body were defined for the classification task. Three retrospective datasets were built for the AI model training, validation, and testing, with a balanced distribution of studies per body region. The test datasets originated from a different healthcare network than the train and validation datasets. Sensitivity and specificity of the classifier was evaluated for patient age, patient sex, institution, scanner manufacturer, contrast, slice thickness, MRI sequence, and CT kernel. The data included a retrospective cohort of 2891 anonymized CT cases (training, 1804 studies; validation, 602 studies; test, 485 studies) and 3339 anonymized MRI cases (training, 1911 studies; validation, 636 studies; test, 792 studies). Twenty-seven institutions from primary care hospitals, community hospitals, and imaging centers contributed to the test datasets. The data included cases of all sexes in equal proportions and subjects aged from 18 years old to + 90 years old. Image-level weighted sensitivity of 92.5% (92.1-92.8) for CT and 92.3% (92.0-92.5) for MRI and weighted specificity of 99.4% (99.4-99.5) for CT and 99.2% (99.1-99.2) for MRI were achieved. Deep learning models can classify CT and MR images by body region including lower and upper extremities with high accuracy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdolescentHuman BodyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnatomyClassificationCTDeep learningMachine learningMedical imagingMRI

Identifiers

PMID36894697
PMCPMC10407003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.