Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895023›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

Microbiota and functional analyses of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in root-knot nematode parasitism of plants.

Ye Li, Shaonan Lei, Zhiqiang Cheng, Lingyue Jin, Ting Zhang, Lian-Ming Liang, Linjie Cheng, Qinyi Zhang, Xiaohong Xu, Canhua Lan and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. mSphere · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FoliarJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Co-InoculatingMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ye Li *Provincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Shaonan Lei *Provincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Zhiqiang Cheng *Provincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Lingyue Jin *Provincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Ting ZhangProvincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Lian-Ming LiangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650091, China.
Linjie ChengProvincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Qinyi ZhangProvincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Xiaohong XuLibrary, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Canhua LanProvincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China.
Chaojun LuState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650091, China.
Minghe MoState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650091, China.
Ke-Qin ZhangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650091, China.
Jianping XuDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. jpxu@mcmaster.ca.
Baoyu TianProvincial University Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Response and Metabolic Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China. tianby@fjnu.edu.cn.
Fujian Normal University · CNYunnan University · CNMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoot-knot nematodes (RKN) are among the most important root-damaging plant-parasitic nematodes, causing severe crop losses worldwide. The plant rhizosphere and root endosphere contain rich and diverse bacterial communities. However, little is known about how RKN and root bacteria interact to impact parasitism and plant health. Determining the keystone microbial taxa and their functional contributions to plant health and RKN development is important for understanding RKN parasitism and developing efficient biological control strategies in agriculture.

resultsThe analyses of rhizosphere and root endosphere microbiota of plants with and without RKN showed that host species, developmental stage, ecological niche, and nematode parasitism, as well as most of their interactions, contributed significantly to variations in root-associated microbiota. Compared with healthy tomato plants at different developmental stages, significant enrichments of bacteria belonging to Rhizobiales, Betaproteobacteriales, and Rhodobacterales were observed in the endophytic microbiota of nematode-parasitized root samples. Functional pathways related to bacterial pathogenesis and biological nitrogen fixation were significantly enriched in nematode-parasitized plants. In addition, we observed significant enrichments of the nifH gene and NifH protein, the key gene/enzyme involved in biological nitrogen fixation, within nematode-parasitized roots, consistent with a potential functional contribution of nitrogen-fixing bacteria to nematode parasitism. Data from a further assay showed that soil nitrogen amendment could reduce both endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and RKN prevalence and galling in tomato plants.

conclusionsResults demonstrated that (1) community variation and assembly of root endophytic microbiota were significantly affected by RKN parasitism; (2) a taxonomic and functional association was found for endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and nematode parasitism; and (3) the change of nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities through the addition of nitrogen fertilizers could affect the occurrence of RKN. Our results provide new insights into interactions among endophytic microbiota, RKN, and plants, contributing to the potential development of novel management strategies against RKN. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaNematodaNitrogen-Fixing BacteriaSolanum lycopersicumAnimalsBacteriaNitrogenPlant DiseasesPlant RootsPlantsNitrogenMeloidogyneNematode-microbe-plant interactionNitrogen fixationNitrogen-fixing bacteriaParasitismRoot-associated microbiotaRoot-knot nematode

Identifiers

PMID36895023
PMCPMC9999639
OpenAlexW4323658084

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.