ArticlePerfusion2024
A comparison of bilateral and unilateral cerebral perfusion for total arch replacement surgery for non-marfan, type A aortic dissection.
Article in Perfusion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unilateral versus bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion during aortic arch surgery: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Reduction of maximal false lumen area ratio by interactive cannulation perfusion in DeBakey type I acute aortic dissection repair.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2025Article
- Advances in Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Degenerative Aortic Valve Disease.Cardiology research · 2025Review
- CarotidWorld journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Fatal cerebral thrombosis after pericardiectomy.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Association of CYP2C19 genotypes with postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Cerebral protection in acute type A aortic dissection surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAcknowledging lacking of consensus exist in total aortic arch (TAA) surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (AAD), this study aimed to investigate the neurologic injury rate between bilateral and unilateral cerebrum perfusion on the specific population.
methodsA total of 595 AAD patients other than Marfan syndrome receiving TAA surgery since March 2013 to March 2022 were included. Among them, 276 received unilateral cerebral perfusion (via right axillary artery, RCP) and 319 for bilateral cerebral perfusion (BCP). The primary outcome was neurologic injury rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, serum inflammation response (high sensitivity C reaction protein, hs-CRP; Interleukin-6, IL-6; cold-inducible RNA binding protein, CIRBP) and neuroprotection (RNA-binding motif 3, RBM3) indexes.
resultsThe BCP group reported a significantly lower permanent neurologic deficits [odds ratio: 0.481, Confidence interval (CI): 0.296-0.782,
conclusionsThis present study indicated that BCP compared with RCP was associated with lower permanent neurologic deficits and 30-day mortality in AAD patients other than Marfan syndrome receiving TAA surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.