Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36898692›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2023

Mechanical energy on anaerobic capacity during a supramaximal treadmill running in men: Is there influence between runners and active individuals?

Alessandro Moura Zagatto, Joel Abraham Martínez González, Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti de Poli, Fabio Augusto Barbieri, Leonardo de Los Santos Bloedow, Leonardo Peyré-Tartaruga

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro Moura ZagattoPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1065-4158
Joel Abraham Martínez GonzálezPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9830-3354
Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti de PoliPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9539-5954
Fabio Augusto BarbieriPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3678-8456
Leonardo de Los Santos BloedowUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Exercise Research Laboratory, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0481-5808
Leonardo Peyré-TartarugaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Exercise Research Laboratory, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-5016
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study verified whether mechanical variables influence the anaerobic capacity outcome on treadmill running and whether these likely influences were dependent of running experience. Seventeen physical active and 18 amateur runners, males, performed a graded exercise test and constant load exhaustive running efforts at 115% of intensity associated to maximal oxygen consumption. During the constant load were determined the metabolic responses (i.e., gas exchange and blood lactate) to estimate the energetic contribution and anaerobic capacity as well as kinematic responses. The runners showed higher anaerobic capacity (16.6%; p = 0.005), but lesser time to exercise failure (-18.8%; p = 0.03) than active subjects. In addition, the stride length (21.4%; p = 0.00001), contact phase duration (-11.3%; p = 0.005), and vertical work (-29.9%; p = 0.015). For actives, the anaerobic capacity did not correlate significantly with any physiologic, kinematic, and mechanical variables and no regression model was fitted using the stepwise multiple regression, while to runners the anaerobic capacity was significantly correlated with phosphagen energetic contribution (r = 0.47; p = 0.047), external power (r = -0.51; p = 0.031), total work (r = -0.54; p = 0.020), external work (r = -0.62; p = 0.006), vertical work (r = -0.63; p = 0.008), and horizontal work (r = -0.61; p = 0.008), and the vertical work and phosphagen energetic contribution presented a coefficient of determination of 62% (p = 0.001). Based on findings, it is possible to assume that for active subjects, the mechanical variables have no influence over the anaerobic capacity, however, for experienced runners, the vertical work and phosphagen energetic contribution have relevant effect over anaerobic capacity output.

Indexed as

Exercise TestRunningAnaerobiosisExerciseHumansMaleOxygen Consumptionblood lactateexcess postexercise oxygen consumptionmechanical worknon-mitochondrial metabolic pathwaysphysical fitness leveltime to effort failure

Identifiers

PMID36898692
PMCPMC10005891
OpenAlexW4323818895

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read42
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.