Evidence mapPaperPMID 36898949Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2023

Using Peer Support to Prevent Diabetes: Results of a Pragmatic RCT.

Michele Heisler, Wendy T Dyer, Holly Finertie, Shelley C Stoll, Deanne Wiley, Cassie D Turner, Tali Sedgwick, Jeffrey Kullgren, Caroline R Richardson, Monique Hedderson and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689530 (UPSTART), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03689530 nacompletednot on this map

UPSTART: Using Peer Support to Aid in Prevention and Treatment in Prediabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2018 to 2022Enrolled450ConditionsPreDiabetesArmsPeer Support, Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current Trends and Future Directions in Urban Social Prescribing.Current environmental health reports · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michele HeislerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: mheisler@umich.edu.
Wendy T DyerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Holly FinertieDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Shelley C StollDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Deanne WileyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Cassie D TurnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Tali SedgwickDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Jeffrey KullgrenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Caroline R RichardsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Monique HeddersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Julie A SchmittdielDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; Department of Health System Sciences, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Michigan · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK092926 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$779k
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · 2025 to 2025
$700k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK113403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh-contact structured diabetes prevention programs are effective in lowering weight and HbA1cs, yet their intensity level can create barriers to participation. Peer support programs improve clinical outcomes among adults with Type 2 diabetes, but their effectiveness in diabetes prevention is unknown. This study examined whether a low-intensity peer support program improved outcomes more than enhanced usual care in a diverse population with prediabetes. STUDY

designThe intervention was tested in a pragmatic 2-arm RCT. SETTING/

participantsParticipants were adults with prediabetes at three healthcare centers.

interventionParticipants randomized to the enhanced usual care arm received educational materials. Participants in the Using Peer Support to Aid in Prevention and Treatment in Prediabetes arm were matched with a peer supporter: another patient who had made healthy lifestyle changes and was trained in autonomy-supportive action planning. Peer supporters were instructed to provide weekly telephone support to their peers on specific action steps toward behavioral goals for 6 months, then monthly support for 6 months.

main outcome measuresChanges in primary outcomes of weight and HbA1c and secondary outcomes of enrollment in formal diabetes prevention programs, self-reported diet, physical activity, health-specific social support, self-efficacy, motivation, and activation at 6 and 12 months were examined.

resultsData collection occurred from October 2018 to March 2022, with analyses completed in September 2022. Among 355 randomized patients, in intention-to-treat analyses, there were no between-group differences in HbA1c or weight changes at 6 and 12 months. Using Peer Support to Aid in Prevention and Treatment in Prediabetes participants were more likely to enroll in structured programs at 6 (AOR=2.45, p=0.009) and 12 (AOR=2.21, p=0.016) months and to report eating whole grains at 6 (4.49, p=0.026) and 12 (4.22, p=0.034) months. They reported greater improvements in perceived social support for diabetes prevention behaviors at 6 (6.39, p<0.001) and 12 (5.48, p<0.001) months, with no differences in other measures.

conclusionsA stand-alone, low-intensity peer support program improved social support and participation in formal diabetes prevention programs but not weight or HbA1c. It will be important to examine whether peer support could effectively complement higher-intensity, structured diabetes prevention programs.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689530. Full protocol available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03689530.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Prediabetic StateAdultCounselingGlycated HemoglobinHumansSocial SupportGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID36898949
PMCPMC10810481
OpenAlexW4323538829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.