Evidence mapPaperPMID 36899288Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2023

Podcast on the Art of the Patient Conversation: Healthcare Provider Perspectives to Improve Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis.

Cortnee Roman, Denise Bruen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cortnee RomanRocky Mountain MS Clinic, 370 East 9th Avenue, Suite 106, 111, 208, Salt Lake City, UT, 84103, USA. croman.np@gmail.com.
Denise BruenDepartment of Neurology, James Q. Miller MS Center of Excellence, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy has been identified as key to improving patient outcomes and is particularly important for patients facing chronic illnesses such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Low health literacy rates can negatively impact communication between healthcare providers and patients and is associated with poor health outcomes. It is critical to raise awareness of conversational techniques to healthcare providers that can support more effective communication with patients. In this podcast article, nurse practitioners discuss multimodal strategies that enable appropriate conversations to meet patients' needs through the following four techniques: patient-centric language, teach-back, open-ended questions, and active listening and paraphrasing. These techniques are incorporated into example patient-provider conversations to demonstrate their effectiveness in clinical practice. Comprehensive patient conversations and optimizing patient interactions builds a trustworthy foundation for shared decision-making to improve health literacy and outcomes in patients with MS. Podcast Discussion (mp4 37425 KB).

Indexed as

Communication techniquesMultiple sclerosisPatient–provider communicationShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36899288
PMCPMC10195922

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.