Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36899419›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

A facilitated social innovation: stakeholder groups using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles for perinatal health across levels of the health system in Cao Bang province, Vietnam.

Anna Bergström, Dinh Phuong Hoa, Nguyen Thu Nga, Trieu Hoa, Tran Thanh Tu, Pham Thi Lan Lien, Tran Trang, Lars Wallin, Lars-Åke Persson, Leif Eriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna BergströmSWEDESD, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. anna.bergstrom@kbh.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-2336
Dinh Phuong HoaResearch Institute for Child Health, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thu NgaResearch Institute for Child Health, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Trieu HoaProvincial Reproductive Health Bureau, Provincial Health Bureau, Cao Bang, Vietnam.
Tran Thanh TuResearch Institute for Child Health, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Pham Thi Lan LienResearch Institute for Child Health, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tran TrangResearch Institute for Child Health, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Lars WallinSchool of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Lars-Åke PerssonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Leif ErikssonSWEDESD, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Forte 2014-02733Uppsala Universitet 2015/1148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal coverage of evidence-based interventions for perinatal health, often part of evidence-based guidelines, could prevent most perinatal deaths, particularly if entire communities were engaged in the implementation. Social innovations may provide creative solutions to the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, but successful use of social innovations relies on the engagement of communities and health system actors. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess whether an earlier successful social innovation for improved neonatal survival that employed regular facilitated Plan-Do-Study-Act meetings on the commune level was feasible and acceptable when implemented on multiple levels of the health system (52 health units) and resulted in actions with plausibly favourable effects on perinatal health and survival in Cao Bang province, northern Vietnam.

methodsThe Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework guided the implementation and evaluation of the Perinatal Knowledge-Into-Practice (PeriKIP) project. Data collection included facilitators' diaries, health workers' knowledge on perinatal care, structured observations of antenatal care, focus group discussions with facilitators, their mentors and representatives of different actors of the initiated stakeholder groups and an individual interview with the Reproductive Health Centre director. Clinical experts assessed the relevance of the identified problems and actions taken based on facilitators' diaries. Descriptive statistics included proportions, means, and t-tests for the knowledge assessment and observations. Qualitative data were analysed by content analysis.

resultsThe social innovation resulted in the identification of about 500 relevant problems. Also, 75% of planned actions to overcome prioritised problems were undertaken, results presented and a plan for new actions to achieve the group's goals to enhance perinatal health. The facilitators had significant roles, ensuring that the stakeholder groups were established based on principles of mutual respect. Overall, the knowledge of perinatal health and performance of antenatal care improved over the intervention period.

conclusionsThe establishment of facilitated local stakeholder groups can remedy the need for tailored interventions and grassroots involvement in perinatal health and provide a scalable structure for focused efforts to reduce preventable deaths and promote health and well-being.

Indexed as

FacilitationImplementation sciencei-PARIHSKnowledge translationPDSA cyclesPerinatal healthSocial innovationVietnam

Identifiers

PMID36899419
PMCPMC9999598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.