Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36899872›Full record

ReviewCells2023

Current State and Future Directions in the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Maximilian Vidovic, Lars Hendrik Müschen, Svenja Brakemeier, Gerrit Machetanz, Marcel Naumann, Sergio Castro-Gomez

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chitinases as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Mild cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current view.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian VidovicDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1453-1681
Lars Hendrik MüschenDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2805-3270
Svenja BrakemeierDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Gerrit MachetanzDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-5306
Marcel NaumannTranslational Neurodegeneration Section "Albrecht Kossel", Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, University of Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
Sergio Castro-GomezDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1581-474X
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by loss of upper and lower motor neurons, resulting in progressive weakness of all voluntary muscles and eventual respiratory failure. Non-motor symptoms, such as cognitive and behavioral changes, frequently occur over the course of the disease. Considering its poor prognosis with a median survival time of 2 to 4 years and limited causal treatment options, an early diagnosis of ALS plays an essential role. In the past, diagnosis has primarily been determined by clinical findings supported by electrophysiological and laboratory measurements. To increase diagnostic accuracy, reduce diagnostic delay, optimize stratification in clinical trials and provide quantitative monitoring of disease progression and treatment responsivity, research on disease-specific and feasible fluid biomarkers, such as neurofilaments, has been intensely pursued. Advances in imaging techniques have additionally yielded diagnostic benefits. Growing perception and greater availability of genetic testing facilitate early identification of pathogenic ALS-related gene mutations, predictive testing and access to novel therapeutic agents in clinical trials addressing disease-modified therapies before the advent of the first clinical symptoms. Lately, personalized survival prediction models have been proposed to offer a more detailed disclosure of the prognosis for the patient. In this review, the established procedures and future directions in the diagnostics of ALS are summarized to serve as a practical guideline and to improve the diagnostic pathway of this burdensome disease.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisNeurodegenerative DiseasesBiomarkersDelayed DiagnosisHumansMotor NeuronsBiomarkersALSamyotrophic lateral sclerosisdiagnosisdiagnosticsMNDmotor neuron disease

Identifiers

PMID36899872
PMCPMC10000757
OpenAlexW4322501084

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read4
measurements read17
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.