Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901524›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Smoking Bans and Circulatory System Disease Mortality Reduction in Macao (China): Using GRA Models.

Xinxin Peng, Xiaolei Tang, Jing Hua Zhang, Yijun Chen

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinxin PengSchool of Business, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-955X
Xiaolei TangSchool of Business, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China.
Jing Hua ZhangSchool of Business, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-4536
Yijun ChenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao 999078, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4788-6334

Funding

Macau University of Science and Technology FRG-22-012-MSB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the association between smoking rates and mortality from circulatory system diseases (CSD) after implementing a series of smoking bans in Macao (China). (1) Background: Macao phased in strict total smoking bans since 2012. During the past decade, smoking rates among Macao women have dropped by half. CSD mortalities in Macao also show a declining trend. (2) Method: Grey relational analysis (GRA) models were adopted to rank the importance of some key factors, such as income per capita, physician density, and smoking rates. Additionally, regressions were performed with the bootstrapping method. (3) Results: Overall, smoking rate was ranked as the most important factor affecting CSD mortality among the Macao population. It consistently remains the primary factor among Macao's female population. Each year, on average 5 CSD-caused deaths were avoided among every 100,000 women, equivalent to about 11.45% of the mean annual CSD mortality. (4) Conclusions: After the implementation of smoking bans in Macao, the decrease in smoking rate among women plays a primary role in the reduction in CSD mortality. To avoid excess CSD mortality due to smoking, Macao needs to continue to promote smoking cessation among the male population.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesSmoke-Free PolicyCardiovascular SystemChinaFemaleHumansMacauMaleSmokingcirculatory system disease mortalitygrey relational analysisMacaosmoking ban

Identifiers

PMID36901524
PMCPMC10001606

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.