ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of MINOCA.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Reclassify Diagnosis and Detect Cardiomyopathies in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Presentation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gallium-Labeled PET Radiopharmaceuticals in Cardiovascular Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Research Progress in Imaging Evaluation of Myocardial Microcirculation.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries: diagnostic and prognostic value.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Review
- MINOCA: A Pathophysiological Approach of Diagnosis and Treatment-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Systematic review of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 mapping in patients with Takotsubo syndrome.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Ejection Fraction-Related Differences of Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes in Troponin-Positive Patients without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- One-Year Prognosis Difference of Myocardial Infarction With or Without Coronary Obstruction in Developing Countries: Insights From the Moroccan Experience.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic criteria for myocarditis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: an educational review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- A Woman's Heart: Improving Uptake and Awareness of Cardiovascular Screening for Middle-Aged Populations.International journal of women's health · 2023Review
- The spectrum of imaging findings in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a pictorial essay.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with Non Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is defined by patients presenting with signs and symptoms similar to acute myocardial infarction, but are found to have non-obstructive coronary arteries angiography. What was once considered a benign phenomenon, MINOCA has been proven to carry with it significant morbidity and worse mortality when compared to the general population. As the awareness for MINOCA has increased, guidelines have focused on this unique situation. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has proven to be an essential first step in the diagnosis of patients with suspected MINOCA. CMR has also been shown to be crucial when differentiating between MINOCA like presentations such as myocarditis, takotsubo and other forms of cardiomyopathy. The following review focuses on demographics of patients with MINOCA, their unique clinical presentation as well as the role of CMR in the evaluation of MINOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.