Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36902836›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Circus Activities as a Health Intervention for Children, Youth, and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

Free Coulston, Kate L Cameron, Kath Sellick, Madeline Cavallaro, Alicia Spittle, Rachel Toovey

Full text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circus Use by Occupational Therapists: A Collective Case Study.Occupational therapy international · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Authentic Online Co-Design: Partnership-Focussed Principles-Driven Online Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Free CoulstonFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0230-3593
Kate L CameronFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Kath SellickFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Madeline CavallaroPhysiotherapy Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne 3065, Australia.
Alicia SpittleFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Rachel TooveyFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1153176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circus activities are emerging as an engaging and unique health intervention. This scoping review summarises the evidence on this topic for children and young people aged up to 24 years to map (a) participant characteristics, (b) intervention characteristics, (c) health and wellbeing outcomes, and (d) to identify evidence gaps. Using scoping review methodology, a systematic search of five databases and Google Scholar was conducted up to August 2022 for peer-reviewed and grey literature. Fifty-seven of 897 sources of evidence were included (42 unique interventions). Most interventions were undertaken with school-aged participants; however, four studies included participants with age ranges over 15 years. Interventions targeted both general populations and those with defined biopsychosocial challenges (e.g., cerebral palsy, mental illness, or homelessness). Most interventions utilised three or more circus disciplines and were undertaken in naturalistic leisure settings. Dosage could be calculated for 15 of the 42 interventions (range one-96 h). Improvements in physical and/or social-emotional outcomes were reported for all studies. There is emerging evidence of positive health outcomes resulting from circus activities used in general populations and those with defined biopsychosocial challenges. Future research should focus on detailed reporting of intervention elements and increasing the evidence base in preschool-aged children and within populations with the greatest need.

Indexed as

childrencircushealth outcomespaediatricsphysical healthscoping reviewsocial-emotional health

Identifiers

PMID36902836
PMCPMC10003779

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.