Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905415›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2023

The launch of satellite: DNA repeats as a cytogenetic tool in discovering the chromosomal universe of wild Triticeae.

Pavel Yu Kroupin, Daniil S Ulyanov, Gennady I Karlov, Mikhail G Divashuk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparative Analysis of Satellite DNA inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Divergence of 10 satellite repeats in Artemisia (Asteraceae: Anthemideae) based on sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis: evidence for species identification and evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavel Yu KroupinAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaya Street, 42, 127550, Moscow, Russia. pavelkroupin1985@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6858-3941
Daniil S UlyanovAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaya Street, 42, 127550, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5880-5931
Gennady I KarlovAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaya Street, 42, 127550, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9016-103X
Mikhail G DivashukAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaya Street, 42, 127550, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-3659
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology · RURussian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization is a powerful tool that enables plant researchers to perform systematic, evolutionary, and population studies of wheat wild relatives as well as to characterize alien introgression into the wheat genome. This retrospective review reflects on progress made in the development of methods for creating new chromosomal markers since the launch of this cytogenetic satellite instrument to the present day. DNA probes based on satellite repeats have been widely used for chromosome analysis, especially for "classical" wheat probes (pSc119.2 and Afa family) and "universal" repeats (45S rDNA, 5S rDNA, and microsatellites). The rapid development of new-generation sequencing and bioinformatical tools, and the application of oligo- and multioligonucleotides has resulted in an explosion in the discovery of new genome- and chromosome-specific chromosome markers. Owing to modern technologies, new chromosomal markers are appearing at an unprecedented velocity. The present review describes the specifics of localization when employing commonly used vs. newly developed probes for chromosomes in J, E, V, St, Y, and P genomes and their diploid and polyploid carriers Agropyron, Dasypyrum, Thinopyrum, Pseudoroegneria, Elymus, Roegneria, and Kengyilia. Particular attention is paid to the specificity of probes, which determines their applicability for the detection of alien introgression to enhance the genetic diversity of wheat through wide hybridization. The information from the reviewed articles is summarized into the TRepeT database, which may be useful for studying the cytogenetics of Triticeae. The review describes the trends in the development of technology used in establishing chromosomal markers that can be used for prediction and foresight in the field of molecular biology and in methods of cytogenetic analysis.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantCytogenetic AnalysisDNA, RibosomalGenetic MarkersIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePoaceaeTriticumDNA, RibosomalGenetic MarkersAgropyronDasypyrumDNA probesElymusIn situ hybridizationKengyiliaPseudoroegneriaRepeated satellite DNARoegneriaThinopyrumWheat improvementWheat wild relativesWide hybridization

Identifiers

PMID36905415
OpenAlexW4323920726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.