Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908422›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2023

A randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of two technology-enhanced diabetes prevention programs in primary care: The DiaBEAT-it study.

Fabio A Almeida, Wen You, Fabiana A Brito, Thais F Alves, Cody Goessl, Sarah S Wall, Richard W Seidel, Brenda M Davy, Mark H Greenawald, Jennie L Hill and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02162901 (The Reach and Effectiveness of Technology-enhanced Diabetes Prevention Programs), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02162901 nacompletednot on this map

The Reach and Effectiveness of Technology-enhanced Diabetes Prevention Programs

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2014 to 2017Enrolled597ConditionsDiabetes PreventionArmsChoice-Class with IVR Calls, Random-Class with IVR calls, Random-Class only, Choice-DVD with IVR calls, Random-DVD with IVR calls
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio A AlmeidaDepartment of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Wen YouDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Fabiana A BritoDepartment of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Thais F AlvesDepartment of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Cody GoesslCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.
Sarah S WallDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Richard W SeidelDepartment of Psychiatry, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Brenda M DavyDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Mark H GreenawaldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Jennie L HillDepartment of Populational Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Paul A EstabrooksDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USCarilion Clinic · USUniversity of Utah · USVirginia Tech · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK091811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of two technology-enhanced interventions for diabetes prevention among adults at risk for developing diabetes in a primary care setting. Methods: The DiaBEAT-it study employed a hybrid 2-group preference (Choice) and 3-group randomized controlled (RCT) design. This paper presents weight related primary outcomes of the RCT arm. Patients from Southwest Virginia were identified through the Carilion Clinic electronic health records. Eligible participants (18 and older, BMI ≥ 25, no Type 2 Diabetes) were randomized to either Choice ( Results: Of the 334 participants that were randomized, 232 (69%) had study measured weights at 6 months, 221 (66%) at 12 months, and 208 (62%) at 18 months. Class/IVR participants were less likely to complete weight measures than SC or DVD/IVR. Intention to treat analyses, controlling for gender, race, age and baseline BMI, showed that DVD/IVR and Class/IVR led to reductions in BMI at 6 (DVD/IVR -0.94, Conclusions: The DiaBEAT-it interventions show promise in responding to the need for scalable, effective methods to manage obesity and prevent diabetes in primary care settings that do not over burden primary care clinics and providers. Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02162901, identifier: NCT02162901.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ObesityAdultHumansPrimary Health CareWeight Lossbehavior changediabetes preventionDVDIVRprimary careweight loss

Identifiers

PMID36908422
PMCPMC9998510
OpenAlexW4321788814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.