ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2023
Efficacy of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Prognostic Value of D-Dimer in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is currently used as a guide for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), however its clinical benefit in comparison with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) remains unclear in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of OCT-guided PCI in comparison with IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS. Methods: The study participants comprised 280 consecutive ACS patients who underwent primary PCI for de novo culprit lesions under OCT or IVUS guidance. Results: Compared with the IVUS-guided group, the OCT-guided group had lower Killip classification (p < 0.001) and lower creatinine level at baseline (0.80 ± 0.37 mg/dl vs. 1.13 ± 1.29 mg/dl, p = 0.004). Fluoroscopy time and total procedure time were significantly shorter in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (32 ± 13 min vs. 41 ± 19 min, p < 0.001, and 98 ± 39 min vs. 127 ± 47 min, p = 0.002, respectively). The major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival curves were similar between the OCT- and IVUS-guided groups after adjusting for clinical background using propensity score (log-rank p = 0.328). Conclusions: After adjusting for clinical background, OCT-guided PCI could provide comparable clinical outcomes to IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS. Shorter fluoroscopy time and total procedure time with OCT may reduce patient radiation exposure and also improve hospital workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.