Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36914191›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Association of red cell distribution width (RDW) and the RDW to platelet count ratio with cardiovascular disease among US adults: a cross-sectional study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2020.

Aikeliyaer Ainiwaer, Kaisaierjiang Kadier, Anniwaer Abulizi, Wen Qing Hou, Rena Rehemuding, Halimulati Maimaiti, Mubalake Yakufu, Xiang Ma, Yi-Tong Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aikeliyaer Ainiwaer *Department of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-8791
Kaisaierjiang Kadier *Department of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-4854
Anniwaer Abulizi *Department of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Wen Qing HouCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Rena RehemudingDepartment of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Halimulati MaimaitiDepartment of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Mubalake YakufuDepartment of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xiang MaDepartment of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China maxiangxj@yeah.net.ORCID 0000-0002-5840-8581
Yi-Tong MaDepartment of Cardiology, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xinjiang Medical University · CNShihezi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between red cell distribution width (RDW) and the RDW to platelet count ratio (RPR) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and to further investigate whether the association involves population differences and dose-response relationships.

designCross-sectional population-based study.

settingThe National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2020).

participantsA total of 48 283 participants aged 20 years or older (CVD, n=4593; non-CVD, n=43 690) were included in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the presence of CVD, while the secondary outcome was the presence of specific CVDs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between RDW or the RPR and CVD. Subgroup analyses were performed to test the interactions between demographics variables and their associations with disease prevalence.

resultsA logistic regression model was fully adjusted for potential confounders; the ORs with 95% CIs for CVD across the second to fourth quartiles were 1.03 (0.91 to 1.18), 1.19 (1.04 to 1.37) and 1.49 (1.29 to 1.72) for RDW (p for trend <0.0001) compared with the lowest quartile. The ORs with 95% CIs for CVD across the second to fourth quartiles were 1.04 (0.92 to 1.17), 1.22 (1.05 to 1.42) and 1.64 (1.43 to 1.87) for the RPR compared with the lowest quartile (p for trend <0.0001). The association of RDW with CVD prevalence was more pronounced in females and smokers (all p for interaction <0.05). The association of the RPR with CVD prevalence was more pronounced in the group younger than 60 years (p for interaction=0.022). The restricted cubic spline also suggested a linear association between RDW and CVD and a non-linear association between the RPR and CVD (p for non-linear <0.05).

conclusionThere are statistical heterogeneities in the association between RWD, RPR distributions and the CVD prevalence, across sex, smoking status and age groups.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesErythrocyte IndicesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNutrition SurveysPlatelet CountRisk Factorsadult cardiologycardiologycoronary heart diseaseheart failure

Identifiers

PMID36914191
PMCPMC10016283
OpenAlexW4324045704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.