Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36914638›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Towards routine chromosome-scale haplotype-resolved reconstruction in cancer genomics.

Shilpa Garg

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Genome assembly in the telomere-to-telomere era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shilpa GargNNF Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark. sgarg@biosustain.dtu.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer genomes are highly complex and heterogeneous. The standard short-read sequencing and analytical methods are unable to provide the complete and precise base-level structural variant landscape of cancer genomes. In this work, we apply high-resolution long accurate HiFi and long-range Hi-C sequencing to the melanoma COLO829 cancer line. Also, we develop an efficient graph-based approach that processes these data types for chromosome-scale haplotype-resolved reconstruction to characterise the cancer precise structural variant landscape. Our method produces high-quality phased scaffolds on the chromosome level on three healthy samples and the COLO829 cancer line in less than half a day even in the absence of trio information, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods. In the COLO829 cancer cell line, here we show that our method identifies and characterises precise somatic structural variant calls in important repeat elements that were missed in short-read-based call sets. Our method also finds the precise chromosome-level structural variant (germline and somatic) landscape with 19,956 insertions, 14,846 deletions, 421 duplications, 52 inversions and 498 translocations at the base resolution. Our simple pstools approach should facilitate better personalised diagnosis and disease management, including predicting therapeutic responses.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMelanomaChromosomesGenome, HumanGenomicsHaplotypesHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID36914638
PMCPMC10011606

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read20
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.