ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2023
Real-world performance analysis of a novel computational method in the precision oncology of pediatric tumors.
Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Twin models to address long-term treatment toxicities in children and young adults with cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Genetic Variants in BER Pathway Genes Confer Wilms Tumor Susceptibility: New Insights from an Eight-Center Case-Control Study in Chinese Children.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe utility of routine extensive molecular profiling of pediatric tumors is a matter of debate due to the high number of genetic alterations of unknown significance or low evidence and the lack of standardized and personalized decision support methods. Digital drug assignment (DDA) is a novel computational method to prioritize treatment options by aggregating numerous evidence-based associations between multiple drivers, targets, and targeted agents. DDA has been validated to improve personalized treatment decisions based on the outcome data of adult patients treated in the SHIVA01 clinical trial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of DDA in pediatric oncology.
methodsBetween 2017 and 2020, 103 high-risk pediatric cancer patients (< 21 years) were involved in our precision oncology program, and samples from 100 patients were eligible for further analysis. Tissue or blood samples were analyzed by whole-exome (WES) or targeted panel sequencing and other molecular diagnostic modalities and processed by a software system using the DDA algorithm for therapeutic decision support. Finally, a molecular tumor board (MTB) evaluated the results to provide therapy recommendations.
resultsOf the 100 cases with comprehensive molecular diagnostic data, 88 yielded WES and 12 panel sequencing results. DDA identified matching off-label targeted treatment options (actionability) in 72/100 cases (72%), while 57/100 (57%) showed potential drug resistance. Actionability reached 88% (29/33) by 2020 due to the continuous updates of the evidence database. MTB approved the clinical use of a DDA-top-listed treatment in 56 of 72 actionable cases (78%). The approved therapies had significantly higher aggregated evidence levels (AELs) than dismissed therapies. Filtering of WES results for targeted panels missed important mutations affecting therapy selection.
conclusionsDDA is a promising approach to overcome challenges associated with the interpretation of extensive molecular profiling in the routine care of high-risk pediatric cancers. Knowledgebase updates enable automatic interpretation of a continuously expanding gene set, a "virtual" panel, filtered out from genome-wide analysis to always maximize the performance of precision treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.