ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Mapping the knowledge structure and emerging trends of efferocytosis research: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efferocytosis and inflammation: a bibliometric and systematic analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Global Trends in COPD Self-Management Research: A Dual-Perspective Bibliometric Analysis (January 2005-July 2025).International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Global research trends of peri-implantitis during the last two decades: a bibliometric and visualized study.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfferocytosis refers to the physiological clearance process of apoptotic cells by specialized and non-phagocytes and it is essential in human health and disease. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and objective reports on the current status of efferocytosis research. Here, we visually analyzed the hotspots and trending issues of efferocytosis research with bibliometric analysis.
methodsRelevant publications were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection on February 18, 2022. We performed bibliometric and visual analysis using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, Microsoft Excel 2019, and the online Bibliometric platform.
resultsA total of 1007 publications on efferocytosis were retrieved. The number of efferocytosis studies increased rapidly from 2006 to 2021. The country that published the most efferocytosis related articles was the USA and the most productive institutions were Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital. The most prolific and influential author was I. Tabas of Columbia University. Frontiers in Immunology published the most research papers on efferocytosis, the while Journal of Immunology had the highest co-citation frequency. The high-frequency keywords were "efferocytosis", "inflammation", "apoptotic cells", "macrophages", and "apoptosis". The analysis of keywords with the strongest citation bursts identified "cell" and "resolution" as emerging hotspots.
conclusionOur results demonstrated that efferocytosis research increased steadily within the past decade. Current efferocytosis studies focus on three main aspects: mechanisms, basic biology, and potential role in disease. The research trends included the cellular players of the efferocytosis process and the role of efferocytosis in inflammation resolution. This bibliometric analysis presented a comprehensive overview of efferocytosis research and provided valuable references and ideas for scholars interested in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36915780PMC10006791What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.