Evidence mapPaperPMID 36920947Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Preclinical evaluation of Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) and Insulin Receptor (IR) as a therapeutic targets in triple negative breast cancer.

Sandra Roche, Patricia Gaule, Deirdre Winrow, Nupur Mukherjee, Fiona O'Neill, Neil T Conlon, Justine Meiller, Denis M Collins, Alexandra Canonici, Mohammed Ibrahim Fawsi and 5 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. [Expression of NFAT5 and IGF1R in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues and analysis of clinical characteristics].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra RocheNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4363-4607
Patricia GauleNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Deirdre WinrowNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Nupur MukherjeeNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona O'NeillNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Neil T ConlonNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Justine MeillerNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Denis M CollinsNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alexandra CanoniciNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mohammed Ibrahim FawsiNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alejandra Estepa-FernándezNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Stephen F MaddenData Science Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
John CrownNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Norma O'DonovanNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alex J EustaceNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Dublin City University · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IESt. Vincent's University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), a subtype of breast cancer, has fewer successful therapeutic therapies than other types of breast cancer. Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) and the Insulin receptor (IR) are associated with poor outcomes in TNBC. Targeting IGF1R has failed clinically. We aimed to test if inhibiting both IR/IGF1R was a rationale therapeutic approach to treat TNBC. We showed that despite IGF1R and IR being expressed in TNBC, their expression is not associated with a negative survival outcome. Furthermore, targeting both IR/IGF1R with inhibitors in multiple TNBC cell lines did not inhibit cell growth. Linsitinib, a small molecule inhibitor of both IGF1R and IR, did not block tumour formation and had no effect on tumour growth in vivo. Cumulatively these data suggest that while IGF1R and IR are expressed in TNBC, they are not good therapeutic targets. A potential reason for the limited anti-cancer impact when IR/IGF1R was targeted may be because multiple signalling pathways are altered in TNBC. Therefore, targeting individual signalling pathways may not be sufficient to inhibit cancer growth.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationHumansReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinReceptors, SomatomedinIGF1R protein, humanReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinReceptors, Somatomedin

Identifiers

PMID36920947
PMCPMC10016661
OpenAlexW4324306058

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read68
reference markers read3
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.