ArticlePoultry science2023
Microbiome modulation, microbiome protein metabolism index, and growth performance of broilers supplemented with a precision biotic.
Article in Poultry science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut check: Exploring tools, techniques, and future directions in microbiome research.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Insights into Non-Antibiotic Alternative and Emerging Control Strategies for Chicken Coccidiosis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Role of a Precision Biotic Fed to Dekalb White Laying Hens at Peak Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Prebiotics in animal nutrition: Harnessing agro-industrial waste for improved gut health and performance.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Review
- Dietary eubiotics of microbial muramidase and glycan improve intestinal villi, ileum microbiota composition and production trait of broiler.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of the present studies were to evaluate: 1) the in vivo impact of the supplementation with a precision biotic (PB) on the growth performance and microbiome modulation of broiler chickens; 2) the role of PB on the modulation of functional pathways of the microbiome collected from animals with low and high body weight gain, and 3) to develop a Microbiome Protein Metabolism Index (MPMI) derived from gut metagenomic data to link microbial protein metabolism with performance. The in vivo work consisted of 2 experiments with 2 treatments: Control vs. PB at 1.1 kg/MT of PB with 21 or 14 replicates of 40 birds per replicate, in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Growth performance was evaluated in both experiments, and from experiment 1, cecal samples from one bird/replicate was collected on d 21 and 42 (n = 21/treatment) to evaluate the microbiome through whole genome sequencing. In the ex vivo assay, 6 cecal samples were collected from low body weight (BW) birds (at 10% below average), and 6 samples from high BW birds (at least 10% above average). The samples were incubated in the presence or absence of PB. After incubation, DNA was isolated to develop a functional genomic assay and the supernatant was separated to measure short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. The MPMI is the sum of beneficial genes in the pathways related to protein metabolism. In the in vivo grow out experiments, it was observed that the supplementation improved the BW gain by 3% in both studies, and the corrected feed conversion ratio (cFCR) by 3.7 and 3.4% in studies 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). The functional microbiome analysis revealed that the PB shifted the microbiome pathways toward a beneficial increase in protein utilization, as shown by higher MPMI. In the ex vivo experiment, the PB increased the abundance of genes related to the beneficial metabolism of protein (quantitative MPMI), and the concentration of SCFA, regardless of the underline BW of the birds. Taken together, the microbiome metabolic shift observed in the in vivo study and higher MPMI, plus the observations from the ex vivo assay with higher SFCA production, may explain the improvement in growth performance obtained with the supplementation of PB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.