Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36922465›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indications, Prevalence, and Safety.

Jerry T Dang, Tiffany Vaughan, Valentin Mocanu, Hadika Mubashir, Juan S Barajas-Gamboa, Ricard Corcelles Codina, John Rodriguez, Shahzeer Karmali, Matthew Kroh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Conversion to Roux en Y gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes from a Middle Eastern cohort.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerry T DangDigestive Diseases & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. dangj3@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8659-0934
Tiffany VaughanCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Valentin MocanuDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Hadika MubashirDigestive Diseases & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Juan S Barajas-GamboaDigestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Ricard Corcelles CodinaDigestive Diseases & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
John RodriguezDigestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Shahzeer KarmaliDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Matthew KrohDigestive Diseases & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) frequently requires conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or weight recurrence. Current evidence evaluating the safety of conversion from SG to RYGB and its indications is limited to single centers.

methodsThe objective was to determine the rate of serious complications and mortality of conversion of SG to RYGB (SG-RYGB) compared to primary RYGB (P-RYGB). This was a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database which includes 30-day outcomes. Individuals undergoing P-RYGB or SG-RYGB were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if revisional surgery was an independent predictor of serious complications or mortality.

resultsIn 2020 and 2021, 84,543 (86.3%) patients underwent P-RYGB and 13,432 (13.7%) underwent SG-RYGB. SG-RYGB cohort had lower body mass index, lower rates of diabetes and hypertension, and higher rates of GERD. GERD was the most common indication for revision (55.3%) followed by weight regain (24.4%) and inadequate weight loss (12.7%). SG-RYGB had longer operative times (145 vs. 125 min, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of serious complications (7.2 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). This included higher rates of anastomotic leak (0.5 vs. 0.4%, p = 0.002), bleeding (2.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), and reoperation (3.0 vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) but not death (0.1 vs. 0.1%, p = 0.385). On multivariable analysis, SG-RYGB was independently predictive of serious complications (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.32, p < 0.001) but not mortality (p = 0.316).

conclusionsWhile SG-RYGB is safe with a low complication rate, SG-RYGB was associated with a higher rate of serious complications compared to P-RYGB.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansPrevalenceReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryComplicationsConversionRevisionRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID36922465
PMCPMC10017068
OpenAlexW4324320997

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.