Evidence mapPaperPMID 36922674Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2023

Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation of axon regeneration.

Yating Cheng, Hongjun Song, Guo-Li Ming, Yi-Lan Weng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Osteoporosis: Exploring the Power of mJournal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yating ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Hongjun SongDepartment of Neuroscience, Mahoney Institute for Neurosciences, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8720-5310
Guo-Li MingDepartment of Neuroscience, Mahoney Institute for Neurosciences, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. gming@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2517-6075
Yi-Lan WengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. yweng@houstonmethodist.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-0401

Funding

Functional roles of genetic risk factors for brain disorders in neurogenesis and neurodevelopmentR35NS097370 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Guo-li Ming · 2021 to 2024
$4.1M
Continuous Neurogenesis in the Mammalian HippocampusR35NS116843 · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · 2025 to 2025
$941k
Systems-wide analysis of oxidative stress-responsive m6A epitranscriptomeR01ES031511 · NIEHS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · 2024 to 2025
$805k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031511NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097370NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116843NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS047344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective axonal regeneration in the adult mammalian nervous system requires coordination of elevated intrinsic growth capacity and decreased responses to the inhibitory environment. Intrinsic regenerative capacity largely depends on the gene regulatory network and protein translation machinery. A failure to activate these pathways upon injury is underlying a lack of robust axon regeneration in the mature mammalian central nervous system. Epigenetics and epitranscriptomics are key regulatory mechanisms that shape gene expression and protein translation. Here, we provide an overview of different types of modifications on DNA, histones, and RNA, underpinning the regenerative competence of axons in the mature mammalian peripheral and central nervous systems. We highlight other non-neuronal cells and their epigenetic changes in determining the microenvironment for tissue repair and axon regeneration. We also address advancements of single-cell technology in charting transcriptomic and epigenetic landscapes that may further facilitate the mechanistic understanding of differential regenerative capacity in neuronal subtypes. Finally, as epigenetic and epitranscriptomic processes are commonly affected by brain injuries and psychiatric disorders, understanding their alterations upon brain injury would provide unprecedented mechanistic insights into etiology of injury-associated-psychiatric disorders and facilitate the development of therapeutic interventions to restore brain function.

Indexed as

AxonsBrain InjuriesAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMammalsNerve RegenerationNeurons

Identifiers

PMID36922674
PMCPMC10650481

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.