Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923653›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2023

Cell therapy for neuropathic pain.

QingHua Yin, TianHao Zou, ShuJun Sun, Dong Yang

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

QingHua YinDepartment of Pain, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
TianHao ZouDepartment of Pain, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
ShuJun SunDepartment of Pain, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dong YangDepartment of Pain, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NP) is caused by a lesion or a condition that affects the somatosensory system. Pathophysiologically, NP can be ascribed to peripheral and central sensitization, implicating a wide range of molecular pathways. Current pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are not very efficacious, with over half of NP patients failing to attain adequate pain relief. So far, pharmacological and surgical treatments have focused primarily on symptomatic relief by modulating pain transduction and transmission, without treating the underlying pathophysiology. Currently, researchers are trying to use cell therapy as a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of NP. In fact, mounting pre-clinical and clinical studies showed that the cell transplantation-based therapy for NP yielded some encouraging results. In this review, we summarized the use of cell grafts for the treatment of NP caused by nerve injury, synthesized the latest advances and adverse effects, discussed the possible mechanisms to inform pain physicians and neurologists who are endeavoring to develop cell transplant-based therapies for NP and put them into clinical practice.

Indexed as

analgesiacell therapynerve injuryneuropathic painstem celltransplantation

Identifiers

PMID36923653
PMCPMC10008860
OpenAlexW4322506623

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read29
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.