Evidence mapPaperPMID 36925392Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2023

Standardised Practice-Based Oral Health Data Collection: A Pilot Study in Different Countries.

Sean Taylor, Sarah R Baker, Tom Broomhead, Rachael England, Steve Mason, Michael Sereny, Georgios Tsakos, David M Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sean TaylorFDI World Dental Federation, Geneva-Cointrin, Switzerland.
Sarah R BakerUnit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, UK.
Tom BroomheadUnit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, UK.
Rachael EnglandFDI World Dental Federation, Geneva-Cointrin, Switzerland. Electronic address: rengland@fdiworlddental.org.
Steve MasonHaleon (formally known as GSK Consumer Healthcare), Weybridge, UK.
Michael SerenyPrivate Dental Practice, Hannover, Germany.
Georgios TsakosDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
David M WilliamsBart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Oral Health Observatory (OHO), launched in 2014 by FDI World Dental Federation, aims to provide a coordinated approach to international oral health data collection. A feasibility project involving 12 countries tested the implementation of the methodology and data collection tools and assessed data quality from 6 countries.

methodsNational dental associations (NDAs) recruited dentists following a standardised sampling method. Dentists and patients completed paired questionnaires (N = 7907) about patients' demographics, dental attendance, oral health-related behaviours, oral impacts, and clinical measures using a mobile app. In addition, participating dentists (n = 93) completed an evaluation survey, and NDAs completed a survey and participated in workshops to assess implementation feasibility.

resultsFeasibility data are presented from the 12 participating countries. In addition, the 6 countries most advanced with data collection as of July 2020 (China, Colombia, India, Italy, Japan, and Lebanon) were included in the assessment of data quality and qualitative evaluation of implementation feasibility. All NDAs in these 6 countries reported interest in collecting standardised, international data for policy and communication activities and to understand service use and needs. Eighty-two percent of dentists (n = 76) reported a patient response rate of between 80% and 100%. More than 70% (n = 71) of dentists were either satisfied or very satisfied with the patient recruitment and data collection methods. There were variations in patient oral health and behaviours across countries, such as self-reporting twice-daily brushing which ranged from 45% in India to 83% in Colombia.

conclusionsOHO provides a feasible model for collecting international standardised data in dental practices. Reducing time implications, ensuring mobile app reliability, and allowing practitioners to access patient-reported outcomes to inform practice may enhance implementation.

Indexed as

DentistsOral HealthHumansPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesFeasibilityImpactsImplementationPractice-based researchStandardised

Identifiers

PMID36925392
PMCPMC10350600

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.