Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925610›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Filling gaps in animal welfare assessment through metabolomics.

Maria Pia Fabrile, Sergio Ghidini, Mauro Conter, Maria Olga Varrà, Adriana Ianieri, Emanuela Zanardi

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Application of Omics in Donkey Meat Research: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Pia FabrileDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Sergio GhidiniDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Mauro ConterDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria Olga VarràDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Adriana IanieriDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Emanuela ZanardiDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability has become a central issue in Italian livestock systems driving food business operators to adopt high standards of production concerning animal husbandry conditions. Meat sector is largely involved in this ecological transition with the introduction of new label claims concerning the defense of animal welfare (AW). These new guarantees referred to AW provision require new tools for the purpose of authenticity and traceability to assure meat supply chain integrity. Over the years, European Union (EU) Regulations, national, and international initiatives proposed provisions and guidelines for assuring AW introducing requirements to be complied with and providing tools based on scoring systems for a proper animal

Indexed as

animal-based measuresbiomarkersFive Domains modelHRMS-based metabolomicsmetabolomics workflowNMR-based metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36925610
PMCPMC10011658

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.