Evidence mapPaperPMID 36925815Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2022

Implementation of a novel ultrasound training programme for midwives in Malawi: A mixed methods evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.

Alexandra C Viner, Monica P Malata, Medrina Mtende, Gladys Membe-Gadama, Martha Masamba, Enita Makwakwa, Catherine Bamuya, David Lissauer, Sarah J Stock, Jane E Norman and 7 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alexandra C VinerMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Monica P MalataCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Medrina MtendeCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Gladys Membe-GadamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Martha MasambaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Enita MakwakwaMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Catherine BamuyaMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
David LissauerCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Sarah J StockCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jane E NormanFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rebecca M ReynoldsCentre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Brian MagowanBorders General Hospital, NHS Borders, Melrose, United Kingdom.
Bridget FreyneFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Luis GadamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Sarah Cunningham-BurleyCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Linda Nyondo-MipandoCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Effie ChipetaCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1Medical Research Council MR/T038683/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recommendation that all women receive an ultrasound in pregnancy prior to 24 weeks', this remains unavailable to many women in low-income countries where trained practitioners are scarce. Although many programmes have demonstrated efficacy, few have achieved longterm sustainability, with a lack of information about how best to implement such programmes. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the implementation of a novel education package to teach ultrasound-naive midwives in Malawi basic obstetric ultrasound, assessing its impact in the context of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Methods: The study ran across six sites in Malawi between October 2020 and June 2021, encompassing three phases; pre-implementation, implementation and post-implementation. Twenty nine midwives underwent a bespoke education package with matched pre and post course surveys assessed their knowledge, attitudes and confidence and "hands on" assessments evaluating practical skills. Training evaluation forms and in-depth interviews explored their satisfaction with the package, with repeat assessment and remote image review evaluating maintenance of skills. Results: 28/29 midwives completed the training, with significant increases in knowledge, confidence and practical skills. Adherence to the education package varied, however many changes to the proposed methodology were adaptive and appeared to facilitate the efficacy of the programme. Unfortunately, despite reporting approval regarding the training itself, satisfaction regarding supervision and follow up was mixed, reflecting the difficulties encountered with providing ongoing in-person and remote support. Conclusion: This programme was successful in improving trainees' knowledge, confidence and skill in performing basic obstetric ultrasound, largely on account of an adaptive approach to implementation. The maintenance of ongoing support was challenging, reflected by trainee dissatisfaction. By evaluating the success of this education package based on its implementation and not just its efficacy, we have generated new insights into the barriers to sustainable upscale, specifically those surrounding maintenance.

Indexed as

gestational ageimplementationMalawimidwivestrainingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36925815
PMCPMC10012721

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.