Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925827›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2022

Do the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies adequately address sustainment?

Nicole Nathan, Byron J Powell, Rachel C Shelton, Celia V Laur, Luke Wolfenden, Maji Hailemariam, Sze Lin Yoong, Rachel Sutherland, Melanie Kingsland, Thomas J Waltz and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicole NathanHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Byron J PowellCenter for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Celia V LaurWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Maji HailemariamDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Sze Lin YoongSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Rachel SutherlandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Melanie KingslandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Thomas J WaltzDepartment of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, United States.
Alix HallSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Funding

MECHANISMS: The MECHANics of Implementation Strategies and MeasureSR01CA262325 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEINER, BRYAN J. · 2021 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sustainability science is an emerging area within implementation science. There is limited evidence regarding strategies to best support the continued delivery and sustained impact of evidence-based interventions (EBIs). To build such evidence, clear definitions, and ways to operationalize strategies specific and/or relevant to sustainment are required. Taxonomies and compilations such as the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) were developed to describe and organize implementation strategies. This study aimed to adapt, refine, and extend the ERIC compilation to incorporate an explicit focus on sustainment. We also sought to classify the specific phase(s) of implementation when the ERIC strategies could be considered and applied. Methods: We used a two-phase iterative approach to adapt the ERIC. This involved: (1) adapting through consensus (ERIC strategies were mapped against barriers to sustainment as identified Results: Surface level changes were made to the definitions of 41 of the 73 ERIC strategies to explicitly address sustainment. Four additional strategies received deeper changes in their definitions. One new strategy was identified: Conclusion: A sustainment-explicit ERIC glossary is provided to help researchers and practitioners develop, test, or apply strategies to improve the sustainment of EBIs in real-world settings. Whilst most ERIC strategies only needed minor changes, their impact on sustainment needs to be tested empirically which may require significant refinement or additions in the future.

Indexed as

design and tailoringimplementation scienceimplementation strategiesmechanismssustainabilitysustainment

Identifiers

PMID36925827
PMCPMC10012683

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.