Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928074›Full record

ArticleNature methods2023

Femtosecond laser microdissection for isolation of regenerating C. elegans neurons for single-cell RNA sequencing.

Peisen Zhao, Sudip Mondal, Chris Martin, Andrew DuPlissis, Shahab Chizari, Ke-Yue Ma, Rajani Maiya, Robert O Messing, Ning Jiang, Adela Ben-Yakar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Automated Platforms inMicromachines · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Laser capture microdissection.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peisen ZhaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Sudip MondalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Chris MartinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Andrew DuPlissisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Shahab ChizariDeparment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ke-Yue MaInterdisciplinary Life Sciences Graduate Programs, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Rajani MaiyaDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Robert O MessingDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ning JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-5922
Adela Ben-YakarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ben-yakar@mail.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-6146
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Femtosecond laser axotomy for in vivo nerve regeneration studies in C elegansR01NS060129 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEN-YAKAR, ADELA · 2007 to 2010
$1.7M
Femtosecond Laser Microdissection to Isolate Single Intact Neurons for Nerve Regeneration StudiesR21NS109821 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEN-YAKAR, ADELA · 2019 to 2019
$430k
NIH HHS P40 OD010440NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060129NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS109821NINDS NIH HHS R21-NS109821NINDS NIH HHS RO1-NS060129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of nerve regeneration can be enhanced by delineating its underlying molecular activities at single-neuron resolution in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans. Existing cell isolation techniques cannot isolate neurons with specific regeneration phenotypes from C. elegans. We present femtosecond laser microdissection (fs-LM), a single-cell isolation method that dissects specific cells directly from living tissue by leveraging the micrometer-scale precision of fs-laser ablation. We show that fs-LM facilitates sensitive and specific gene expression profiling by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), while mitigating the stress-related transcriptional artifacts induced by tissue dissociation. scRNA-seq of fs-LM isolated regenerating neurons revealed transcriptional programs that are correlated with either successful or failed regeneration in wild-type and dlk-1 (0) animals, respectively. This method also allowed studying heterogeneity displayed by the same type of neuron and found gene modules with expression patterns correlated with axon regrowth rate. Our results establish fs-LM as a spatially resolved single-cell isolation method for phenotype-to-genotype mapping.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsLasersMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMicrodissectionNeuronsSequence Analysis, RNACaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDLK-1 protein, C elegansMAP Kinase Kinase Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36928074
OpenAlexW4327568923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.