Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928267›Full record

ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2023

Achievement Rates for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in Patients at High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Real-World Setting in Japan.

Hironobu Mitani, Kota Suzuki, Junya Ako, Kazuma Iekushi, Renata Majewska, Salsabil Touzeni, Shizuya Yamashita

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hironobu MitaniMedical Affairs Division, Novartis Pharma K.K.
Kota SuzukiMedical Affairs Division, Novartis Pharma K.K.
Junya AkoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine.
Kazuma IekushiMedical Affairs Division, Novartis Pharma K.K.
Renata MajewskaHealth Economics & Outcome Research, Creativ-Ceutical.
Salsabil TouzeniHealth Economics & Outcome Research, Creativ-Ceutical.
Shizuya YamashitaDepartment of Cardiology, Rinku General Medical Center.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHCreativ-Ceutical (France) · FRKitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017).

methodsPatients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal <120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal <70 mg/dL).

resultsThe mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%).

conclusionsThe proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeGoalsHumansJapanTreatment OutcomeAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCholesterolLDL-C targetRisk factorsStatin

Identifiers

PMID36928267
PMCPMC10627744
OpenAlexW4327640186

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.