Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928279›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2023

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Vistusertib vs Paclitaxel Alone in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: The OCTOPUS Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Susana Banerjee, Gaia Giannone, Andrew R Clamp, Darren P Ennis, Rosalind M Glasspool, Rebecca Herbertson, Jonathan Krell, Ruth Riisnaes, Hasan B Mirza, Zhao Cheng and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Susana BanerjeeGynaecology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gaia GiannoneOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Andrew R ClampThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Darren P EnnisOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Rosalind M GlasspoolBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rebecca HerbertsonSussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Jonathan KrellMedical Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ruth RiisnaesDivision of Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Hasan B MirzaOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Zhao ChengOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline McDermottDepartment of Histopathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Clare GreenUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Rebecca S KristeleitResearch Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angela GeorgeGynaecology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Charlie GourleyCancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Liz-Anne LewsleyCRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Debbie RaiCRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Udai BanerjiDivision of Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Samantha HinsleyCRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Iain A McNeishOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBOvarian Cancer Action · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (PR-HGSC) have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. Preclinical studies support targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in this setting, and a phase 1 study of the dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor vistusertib with weekly paclitaxel showed activity. Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of vistusertib to weekly paclitaxel improves clinical outcomes in patients with PR-HGSC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited patients from UK cancer centers between January 2016 and March 2018. Patients with PR-HGSC of ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal origin and with measurable or evaluable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and/or Gynecological Cancer Intergroup cancer antigen 125 criteria) were eligible. There were no restrictions on number of lines of prior therapy. Data analysis was performed from May 2019 to January 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) plus oral vistusertib (50 mg twice daily) or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included response rate, overall survival, and quality of life. Results: A total of 140 patients (median [range] age, 63 [36-86] years; 17.9% with platinum-refractory disease; 53.6% with ≥3 prior therapies) were randomized. In the paclitaxel plus vistusertib vs paclitaxel plus placebo groups, there was no difference in progression-free survival (median, 4.5 vs 4.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 80% CI, 0.67-1.07; 1-sided P = .18), overall survival (median, 9.7 vs 11.1 months; HR, 1.21; 80% CI, 0.91-1.60) or response rate (odds ratio, 0.86; 80% CI, 0.55-1.36). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were 41.2% (weekly paclitaxel plus vistusertib) vs 36.7% (weekly paclitaxel plus placebo), and there was no difference in quality of life. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel and dual mTORC1/2 inhibition in patients with PR-HGSC, vistusertib did not improve clinical activity of weekly paclitaxel. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16426935.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Middle AgedMorpholinesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPyrimidinesQuality of LifeBenzamidesMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1MorpholinesPaclitaxelPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPyrimidinesvistusertib

Identifiers

PMID36928279
PMCPMC10020933
OpenAlexW4327578003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.