ArticleScientific reports2023
CRISPR-Cas9 editing of TLR4 to improve the outcome of cardiac cell therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomaterial-Assisted Stem Cell Therapy and Exosome Delivery in Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent trends in modified mesenchymal stromal cells: engineering approaches and international regulatory landscape.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Toll Like Receptor 4: A Potential Link Between Obesity and Metabolic Diseases.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Review
- SASP-mediated cellular senescence following myocardial infarction: from spatiotemporal immune regulation to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advances in novel biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.PeerJ · 2026Review
- Beyond Lipids and Platelets: A Review of Anti-Inflammatory Strategies in Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- CRISPR-based gene therapy for huntington's disease: current advances and future prospects.Neurogenetics · 2025Review
- CRISPR-mediated engineering of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells: a summary of recent progress in immunological applications for regenerative medicine and cancer therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Acute Myocardial Infarction: Molecular Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management.MedComm · 2025Review
- Hydrogels in Cardiac Surgery: Versatile Platforms for Tissue Repair, Adhesion Prevention, and Localized Therapeutics.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An overview on cardiac regeneration revolution: exploring the promise of stem cell therapies.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Beneficial and challenges of exosome application in ischemic heart disease.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Gene- and cell-based therapy in cardiovascular diseases.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2025Article
- Advanced delivery systems for gene editing: A comprehensive review from the GenE-HumDi COST Action Working Group.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Stem cell and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology in Alzheimer's disease therapy: from basic research to clinical innovation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- The Role of Epigenetics in Myocardial Infarction: Mechanism, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Potential.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Applications of Genome Editing Technologies in CAD Research and Therapy with a Focus on Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation and fibrosis limit the reparative properties of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs). We hypothesized that disrupting the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) gene would switch hMSCs toward a reparative phenotype and improve the outcome of cell therapy for infarct repair. We developed and optimized an improved electroporation protocol for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. This protocol achieved a 68% success rate when applied to isolated hMSCs from the heart and epicardial fat of patients with ischemic heart disease. While cell editing lowered TLR4 expression in hMSCs, it did not affect classical markers of hMSCs, proliferation, and migration rate. Protein mass spectrometry analysis revealed that edited cells secreted fewer proteins involved in inflammation. Analysis of biological processes revealed that TLR4 editing reduced processes linked to inflammation and extracellular organization. Furthermore, edited cells expressed less NF-ƙB and secreted lower amounts of extracellular vesicles and pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cytokines than unedited hMSCs. Cell therapy with both edited and unedited hMSCs improved survival, left ventricular remodeling, and cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI) in mice. Postmortem histologic analysis revealed clusters of edited cells that survived in the scar tissue 28 days after MI. Morphometric analysis showed that implantation of edited cells increased the area of myocardial islands in the scar tissue, reduced the occurrence of transmural scar, increased scar thickness, and decreased expansion index. We show, for the first time, that CRISPR-Cas9-based disruption of the TLR4-gene reduces pro-inflammatory polarization of hMSCs and improves infarct healing and remodeling in mice. Our results provide a new approach to improving the outcomes of cell therapy for cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.