Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934331›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2023

Cognition and Mortality Risk Among Midlife and Older Americans.

Dana A Glei, Carlos F Mendes de Leon, Chioun Lee, Maxine Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana A GleiCenter for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2865-9355
Carlos F Mendes de LeonCenter for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3020-826X
Chioun LeeDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6886-8397
Maxine WeinsteinCenter for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

U19 MIDlife in the United States-Diversity Supplement-WellsU19AG051426 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAROL D. RYFF · 2016 to 2026
$74.8M
STATISTICS COREP01AG020166 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2002 to 2015
$50.6M
Integrative Pathways to Cognitive, Affective, and Brain HealthU01AG077928 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson, MARGIE E LACHMAN · 2022 to 2026
$17.7M
Gender Differences in Early Life Adversity: Adult Obesity and Cardiovascular RiskR00AG052458 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI LEE, CHIOUN · 2018 to 2020
$713k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020166NIA NIH HHS R00 AG052458NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077928NIA NIH HHS U19 AG051426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive impairment is associated with increased mortality rates in late life, but it is unclear whether worse cognition predicts working-age mortality.

methodsThe data come from a U.S. national survey (N = 3 973 aged 32-84 at cognitive testing in 2004-06, mean age 56.6, 56.3% female; N = 3 055 retested in 2013-18 at ages 42-94, mean age 64.6, 56.6% female; mortality follow-up through 2019). We use Cox hazard models to investigate whether cognition is associated with mortality below age 65, how the magnitude of this risk compares with the risk in later life, and whether the association persists after adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsWorse cognition is associated with mortality, but the demographic-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) diminishes with age from 2.0 per standard deviation (SD; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-2.4) at age 55-1.4 (95% CI, 1.3-1.6) at age 85. In the fully adjusted model, the corresponding HRs are 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) and 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.4), respectively. The absolute differences in mortality by level of cognition, however, are larger at older ages because mortality is rare at younger ages. The fully adjusted model implies a 2.7 percentage point differential in the estimated percentage dying between ages 55 and 65 for those with low cognition (1 SD below the overall mean, 5.7%) versus high cognition (1 SD above the mean, 3.0%). The corresponding differential between ages 75 and 85 is 8.4 percentage points (24.6% vs 16.2%, respectively).

conclusionsCognitive function may be a valuable early warning sign of premature mortality, even at working ages, when dementia is rare.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMortality, PrematureRisk FactorsCognitive functionDeathUnited StatesWorking ages

Identifiers

PMID36934331
PMCPMC10329224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.