Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935524›Full record

ArticleAging cell2023

Large-Scale metabolomics: Predicting biological age using 10,133 routine untargeted LC-MS measurements.

Johan K Lassen, Tingting Wang, Kirstine L Nielsen, Jørgen B Hasselstrøm, Mogens Johannsen, Palle Villesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan K LassenBioinformatics Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0452-566X
Tingting WangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kirstine L NielsenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jørgen B HasselstrømDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mogens JohannsenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Palle VillesenBioinformatics Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics is the study of all detectable small molecules, and in geroscience, metabolomics has shown great potential to describe the biological age-a complex trait impacted by many factors. Unfortunately, the sample sizes are often insufficient to achieve sufficient power and minimize potential biases caused by, for example, demographic factors. In this study, we present the analysis of biological age in ~10,000 toxicologic routine blood measurements. The untargeted screening samples obtained from ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-quadruple time of flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC- QTOF) cover + 300 batches and + 30 months, lack pooled quality controls, lack controlled sample collection, and has previously only been used in small-scale studies. To overcome experimental effects, we developed and tested a custom neural network model and compared it with existing prediction methods. Overall, the neural network was able to predict the chronological age with an rmse of 5.88 years (r

Indexed as

MetabolomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryCarnitineChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidacylcarnitineCarnitineaccelerated agingbig datainflammagingmachine learningmetabolomicsmolecular biology of agingtryptophan metabolism

Identifiers

PMID36935524
PMCPMC10186604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.