Evidence mapPaperPMID 36935726Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2023

Household polluting cooking fuels and adverse birth outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mengrui Luo, Tiancong Liu, Changcheng Ma, Jianwei Fang, Zhiying Zhao, Yu Wen, Yang Xia, Yuhong Zhao, Chao Ji

Full text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Uterine Vulnerability to Environmental PMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengrui LuoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Tiancong LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Changcheng MaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jianwei FangClinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhiying ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yu WenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yang XiaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yuhong ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Chao JiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: The current study aimed to clarify the association between household polluting cooking fuels and adverse birth outcomes using previously published articles. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were undertaken for relevant studies that had been published from inception to 16 January 2023. We calculated the overall odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for adverse birth outcomes [low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), stillbirth, and preterm birth (PTB)] associated with polluting cooking fuels (biomass, coal, and kerosene). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were also conducted. Results: We included 16 cross-sectional, five case-control, and 11 cohort studies in the review. Polluting cooking fuels were found to be associated with LBW (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.52), SGA (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.94), stillbirth (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.55), and PTB (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.36). The results of most of the subgroup analyses were consistent with the main results. In the meta-regression of LBW, study design (cohort study: Conclusion: The use of household polluting cooking fuels could be associated with LBW, SGA, stillbirth, and PTB. The limited literature, observational study design, exposure and outcome assessment, and residual confounding suggest that further strong epidemiological evidence with improved and standardized data was required to assess health risks from particular fuels and technologies utilized.

Indexed as

Premature BirthStillbirthCohort StudiesCookingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornObservational Studies as TopicPregnancycooking fuelslow birth weightmeta-analysispreterm birthsmall for gestational agestillbirth

Identifiers

PMID36935726
PMCPMC10020710

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read38
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.