Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938078›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2023

Predicting Kidney Transplant Recipient Cohorts' 30-Day Rehospitalization Using Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Care Record Data.

Michael Arenson, Julien Hogan, Liyan Xu, Raymond Lynch, Yi-Ting Hana Lee, Jinho D Choi, Jimeng Sun, Andrew Adams, Rachel E Patzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael ArensonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Julien HoganDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Liyan XuDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Raymond LynchDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yi-Ting Hana LeeDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jinho D ChoiDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jimeng SunDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Andrew AdamsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Rachel E PatzerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
J: NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002382 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Vasiliki Michopoulos · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Reducing Disparities among Kidney Transplant RecipientsR01MD011682 · NIMHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, ANDREW B, PATZER, RACHEL E · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002382NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rehospitalization after kidney transplant is costly to patients and health care systems and is associated with poor outcomes. Few prediction model studies have examined whether inclusion of clinical notes data from the electronic medical record (EMR) enhances prediction of rehospitalization. Methods: In a retrospective, observational study of first-time, adult kidney transplant recipients at a large, urban hospital in southeastern United States (2005-2015), we examined 30-day rehospitalization (30DR) using structured EMR and unstructured (i.e., clinical notes) data. We used natural language processing (NLP) methods on 8 types of clinical notes and included terms in predictive models using unsupervised machine learning approaches. Both the area under the receiver operating curve and precision-recall curve (ROC and PRC, respectively) were used to determine and compare model accuracy, and 5-fold cross-validation tested model performance. Results: Among 2060 kidney transplant recipients, 30.7% were readmitted within 30 days. Predictive models using clinical notes did not meaningfully improve performance over previous models using structured data alone (ROC 0.6821; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6644, 0.6998). Predictive models built using solely clinical notes performed worse than models using both clinical notes and structured data. The data that contributed to the top performing models were not identical but both included structured data and progress notes (ROC 0.6902; 95% CI: 0.6699, 0.7105). Conclusions: Including new features from clinical notes in risk prediction models did not substantially increase predictive accuracy for 30DR for kidney transplant recipients. Future research should consider pooling data from multiple institutions to increase sample size and avoid overfitting models.

Indexed as

early readmissionkidney transplantationmachine learningnatural language processingpredicting readmissionrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID36938078
PMCPMC10014371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.