Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938379›Full record

ArticleNetwork modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics2023

COVID-19 and pneumonia diagnosis from chest X-ray images using convolutional neural networks.

Muhab Hariri, Ercan Avşar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhab HaririElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Çukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2200-1915
Ercan AvşarNational Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University Denmark, 9850 Hirtshals, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1356-2753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray is a useful imaging modality widely utilized for diagnosing COVID-19 virus that infected a high number of people all around the world. The manual examination of these X-ray images may cause problems especially when there is lack of medical staff. Usage of deep learning models is known to be helpful for automated diagnosis of COVID-19 from the X-ray images. However, the widely used convolutional neural network architectures typically have many layers causing them to be computationally expensive. To address these problems, this study aims to design a lightweight differential diagnosis model based on convolutional neural networks. The proposed model is designed to classify the X-ray images belonging to one of the four classes that are Healthy, COVID-19, viral pneumonia, and bacterial pneumonia. To evaluate the model performance, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score were calculated. The performance of the proposed model was compared with those obtained by applying transfer learning to the widely used convolutional neural network models. The results showed that the proposed model with low number of computational layers outperforms the pre-trained benchmark models, achieving an accuracy value of 89.89% while the best pre-trained model (Efficient-Net B2) achieved accuracy of 85.7%. In conclusion, the proposed lightweight model achieved the best overall result in classifying lung diseases allowing it to be used on devices with limited computational power. On the other hand, all the models showed a poor precision on viral pneumonia class and confusion in distinguishing it from bacterial pneumonia class, thus a decrease in the overall accuracy.

Indexed as

ClassificationConvolutional neural networksCOVID-19Deep learningLung diseasesTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36938379
PMCPMC10010229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.