Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36946116›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Shared reproductive disruption, not neural crest or tameness, explains the domestication syndrome.

Ben Thomas Gleeson, Laura A B Wilson

Open access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harnessing adaptive alleles in native animals for sustainable intensification of livestock.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026
    Article
  2. Mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs and its consequences for dog evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-term synchronous changes in body size among domesticated and wild species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The domestication of the larynx: The neural crest connection.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben Thomas GleesonFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6911-6202
Laura A B WilsonSchool of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-8277
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered neural crest cell (NCC) behaviour is an increasingly cited explanation for the domestication syndrome in animals. However, recent authors have questioned this explanation, while others cast doubt on whether domestication syndrome even exists. Here, we review published literature concerning this syndrome and the NCC hypothesis, together with recent critiques of both. We synthesize these contributions and propose a novel interpretation, arguing shared trait changes under ancient domestication resulted primarily from shared disruption of wild reproductive regimes. We detail four primary selective pathways for 'reproductive disruption' under domestication and contrast these succinct and demonstrable mechanisms with cryptic genetic associations posited by the NCC hypothesis. In support of our perspective, we illustrate numerous important ways in which NCCs contribute to vertebrate reproductive phenotypes, and argue it is not surprising that features derived from these cells would be coincidentally altered under major selective regime changes, as occur in domestication. We then illustrate several pertinent examples of Darwin's 'unconscious selection' in action, and compare applied selection and phenotypic responses in each case. Lastly, we explore the ramifications of reproductive disruption for wider evolutionary discourse, including links to wild 'self-domestication' and 'island effect', and discuss outstanding questions.

Indexed as

DomesticationNeural CrestAnimalsBiological EvolutionPhenotypeReproductionanimal domesticationisland effectneural crest cell hypothesisself-domesticationunconscious selection

Identifiers

PMID36946116
PMCPMC10031412
OpenAlexW4353015192

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.